Endultra Technologyt Advertisement
Cow Terrorism

The Door to Communalism & Fear was Opened by Vajpayee

Vajpayee’s Contribution To The Hindutva Agenda Goes Well Beyond Babri And 2002

The door to today’s political climate of communalism, hyper-nationalism and fear was opened by Vajpayee

Chhattisgarh: Ujjwala Scheme Is Another Jumla. Not Able To Refill LPG Cylinders, Poor Women Still Use Chulhas, Get Exposed To Hazardous Pollutants.

The Ujjwala scheme, launched in 2016, has been facing criticism from the start for having short-sighted solutions to a much larger problem.

Many beneficiaries of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s much-hyped Ujjwala scheme are continuing to use chulhas and traditional forms of cooking fuel in poll-bound Chhattisgarh, The Economic Times reported.

One beneficiary, Vimla, told ET, “My husband is a casual labourer. A refill is too expensive at Rs 800-900. It is cheaper for me to go for firewood nearby and light a fire.” Her LPG cylinder ran out two months ago, and she has gone back to using the chulha since then.

Har Bai Patle, another beneficiary from a village in Bilaspur district, explained this in detail, “The first cylinder is for free. It lasts up to 2 months and then we have to go for a refill, which is Rs 850-900 now. We are agricultural labourers. So at one time we do not have this kind of money to spare. Even then, it is more expensive than the uplas (cow dung cakes). We can make these at home or even buy for Rs 600 a supply for 3-3.5 months. How is it even comparable?”

On top of this, villagers are duped by those providing the refills. One resident of Kewtara village told ET, “When we go, they charge us the full amount but don’t fill the cylinder completely. We realise it now since the first cylinder lasted us 2 months but the refill finished in just a month.”

The Ujjwala scheme, launched in 2016, has been facing criticism from the start for having short-sighted solutions to a much larger problem. Under the scheme, women belonging to BPL households are provided with an LPG cylinder. However, it has proved to be unsustainable for the beneficiaries in the long run. The chief reason behind this is the fact that most of these households cannot afford a refill of the LPG cylinder.

The village women who cook over dung-fuelled chulhas for several hours a day are exposed to hazardous pollutants. Air pollution leads not only to respiratory illness but has also been linked to heart disease, stroke, cataracts and lung cancer.

Centre Did Not Inform Sikkim About Doklam Stand-Off: Chamling

“Even during such tense times, whatever I heard and saw on the stand-off was from television and newspapers,” said Chamling.

Sikkim Chief Minister Pawan Chamling has said that during the Doklam stand-off with China, the state government was kept in the dark by the Centre.

He said neither the central government nor the Army had informed him anything about the situation.

“Even during such tense times, whatever I heard and saw on the stand-off was from television and newspapers,” Chamling told a group of visiting journalists from West Bengal here yesterday.

He said that there was a fear psychosis among the people of Sikkim on the Doklam issue.

The Sikkim government’s stand was to do everything in its capacity to uphold the sanctity and security of the nation, the chief minister said.

Troops of India and China were locked in a 73-day stand-off in Doklam from June 16 last year, after the Indian side stopped building of a road in the disputed area by the Chinese Army. The stalemate ended on August 28.

Responding to a question about Sikkim-West Bengal relations in the context of separate statehood demand in Darjeeling, Chamling said he had spoken to Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on more than one occasions and assured her of working together to maintain peace in the hills.

Chamling, the longest serving chief minister in the country, said the two states have agreed to share each other’s resources in sectors such as tourism and industry.

He said the focus of his government is to ensure qualitative development through scientific, environment-friendly and sustainable methods.

Some of the steps taken by the Sikkim government towards environment conservation has resulted in a four per cent increase in forest cover, the chief minister said.

Chamling also said the state is working towards enhancing the quality of education in Sikkim.

Vajpayee’s Contribution To The Hindutva Agenda Goes Well Beyond Babri And 2002

The door to today’s political climate of communalism, hyper-nationalism and fear was opened by Vajpayee

Once, when I was fourteen, I was returning home from school along with my two classmates – a boy and a girl – when we were stopped by a cop. It happened to be Valentine’s Day and the cop was curious why three children of opposite genders were walking together. Nothing really happened. The cop kept us standing for fifteen minutes and let us go only after my friend convinced the cop that the girl was his sister. Nevertheless, for a sheltered adolescent like me it was a scary experience. The arbitrary power that the cop held over us was evident. It was the first time that I realized that I could get into trouble for something I didn’t do, and something that shouldn’t have been a crime in the first place. What I didn’t realise at the time was that I was being introduced to the culture of fear. The year was 2000 and the Prime Minister was Atal Bihari Vajpayee.

Nowadays, I am all too familiar with the era of Hindutva and the culture of fear that fuels it. Whenever I stand up for the National Anthem in a theatre or shy away from making a political joke, I know that I am not doing it because I want to but because I am afraid. But back then, this concept was still new. And it was introduced under the Vajpayee government.

In the last two days, hundreds of obituaries poured out, extolling our former Prime Minister for his vision and leadership, and rightly so. Vajpayee was one of the most consequential leaders of this country because of his creative foreign policy, economic reforms, infrastructure schemes, the nuclear tests, defence reforms, telecom and internet policies. But his most important virtue, as we are constantly reminded, was his moderation. The two blots on his long career of moderate politics were his cryptic encouragement during Babri Masjid demolition in 1992 and his double-speak after the 2002 Gujarat riots.

However, Vajpayee’s contribution to the Hindutva agenda went far beyond these two incidents. In fact, Vajpayee’s tenure can been seen as the first systematic attempt in the country to make communalism, hyper-nationalism and the culture of fear seem normal and palatable. The stage was set as soon as Vajpayee took office. One publication counted 77 major incidents of communal violence that made national news in the first ten months of his government. A human rights organization asserted that 30 communal incidents had happened in Gujarat in two months of 1998 alone. In Randhikpur, Gujarat, five hundred Muslims were made homeless overnightwhen a Hindu girl eloped with a Muslim boy.

And it wasn’t just limited to violence. Indians started discovering new “anti-nationals” in their midst everyday. Anti-Muslim propaganda became commonplace. “Muslims in this country too should support Indian team” in India-Pakistan cricket matches, a VHP leader helpfully suggested. MF Hussain’s house was ransacked over his controversial paintings and the Censor Board asked that saffron headbands be removed when depicting a Hindu-Muslim riot in the 1998 film Zakhm. An NCERT report pointed out that changes being made in school history textbooks gave them “blatantly communal orientation”. Anti-Valentine’s Day campaigns were launched in various parts of the country. Women were told to shun skirts and jeans by political leaders.

Of course, these events were much too small in scale compared to today, but they were the beginning. With such stories appearing in the media day after day, the public got used them. Over the next six years, this political climate steadily ratcheted up. By 2003, the communalism had become blatant enough that the RSS Chief began suggesting that the Muslim security in India depended upon goodwill of the Hindus and demanded that Catholic churches in India de-link themselves from the Vatican. However, the most important change was how this culture became steadily normalized and acceptable in the political discourse. One indication of it was how other political parties began shifting to the right as well. By 2003, cow-protection agenda was embraced by some political leaders of Congress as well. Another indication was how media became comfortable in discussing these incidents as just another political strategy. Perhaps the most disturbing example of this was the political analysis surrounding the March 2003 Himachal Pradesh Assembly election published in mainstream media. It were the first election in North India after the 2002 Gujarat riots and media treated it as a “referendum” on the riots. Several articles discussed the political utility of the riots and “aggressive line of Hindutva” as BJP’s strategy without even mentioning the moral horror that had accompanied them.

So why is Vajpayee remembered for his moderation? What helped him most was what one contemporary called “secular wish-fulfilment”. There was a strong desire within the liberal India to see him as a moderate and to believe that Indian secularism remained intact despite the evidence to the contrary. The BJP Government also employed three main strategies to keep Hindutva palatable. First, corruption and economic liberalization issues were kept on the forefront, while Hindutva agenda kept building up beneath the surface. Second, stories of fissures within Hindu right-wing were forever highlighted – Vajpayee vs. Advani, BJP vs. RSS, RSS vs. VHP – as a distraction, all the while these elements worked hand-in-hand on the ground. Third, Vajpayee and others sought to redefine Hindutva and present it as a benign ideology, often using vague or meaningless explanations, going as far as to suggest that it had nothing to do with Hinduism.

Meanwhile, BJP government prepared the country for today’s political climate. To be sure, none can shirk the responsibility – politicians of all stripes, media and even the average voter, we are all culpable in bringing about the culture of fear. However, the door was opened by Vajpayee and it was not that difficult to see, even back then, where this road would eventually lead. He was either an unwitting abettor or willingly complicit – at best he played with fire without understanding that it was bound to go out of control, or at worst, he knowingly lit the match which burned down the building. Either way, it is one of his legacies and must be reckoned with. Along with giving the nation nuclear bomb and a liberalized economy, he also had a hand in ensuring that I stand up for the Indian National Anthem in the theatre before I can watch Captain America.

Sandeep Bhardwaj is a researcher working on South Asian history and foreign policy at The Centre for Policy Research.


Facebook Comments
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Most Popular

Endultra Technologyt Advertisement
To Top
WhatsApp Join WhatsApp Group